Select Page

Technical debt: Why the manufacturing industry and Dig Dug have a lot in common

Aug 11, 2020 | Admin, Advisory Services, Latest News, Manufacturing

The beauty of the classic arcade is how easily and dreamily you lost track of time there—a fond memory today’s kids will never know. And one of the best games for losing track of time? Dig Dug. A maze of repeatedly fending off pesky creatures in the dirt with no end in sight (except the call of everlasting glory on the high score screen). While hours in the arcade letting that Dig Dug theme become an earworm may have been the perfect way to spend a day in the 80s, such a life has no place in your manufacturing organization today. Unfortunately, this is the reality for many companies dealing with technical debt. 

When a growing pile of incomplete fixes, code retrofits, and unfinished documentation are holding you back from the innovation and scale necessary for growth, that probably means you have excessive technical debt (or green dragons and red tomatoes, shall we say?) overpowering your organization. Technical debt is the cost of reworking or retrofitting technology solutions that are either improper for or fall short of your organization’s needs. Basically, anything that compromises the long-term viability of your business’ tech stack is technical debt, and, like Mr. Dig Dug himself, many manufacturers spend too much time repeatedly waging war against it. However, there are better ways to crawl out of this hole. 

To help you get started dig-dugging your way through to a true eradication of technical debt, I want to cover two key sources of manufacturing technical debt: siloed knowledge/rogue departments and highly customized solutions. And then, conversely, we’ll take a look at some tried and true repayment plans our own manufacturing clients have used to solve those problems. 

 

DEBT: Siloed knowledge and rogue departments

One of the most common forms of technical debt we see in manufacturing organizations is siloed knowledge and rogue departments. What this means is business units aren’t adequately communicating, every department charts its own course, and there is no clear ownership over technology decisions. All of this creates an ever-increasing need to reconfigure the technology so it better aligns with a cross-functional vision—and that degree of refactoring that will demand attention sooner or later? That’s the technical debt. This landscape of disparate processes and poor alignment can…

 


 

Want to keep reading? Check out the complete ebook—”The Manufacturer’s Guide to Optimizing Revenue Recognition.”

 

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Authors

Simplus Logo
Simplus team
| + posts
Tips for a successful CPQ post go-live implementation

Tips for a successful CPQ post go-live implementation

CPQ is, first and foremost, a sales tool that enables sales teams to quickly and efficiently generate quotes. However, we rarely talk about the go-live process and how to navigate it successfully.  In a recent webinar hosted by Panaya, Gilles Muys, VP of Customer...

Looking back at the trends of 2022 in manufacturing

Looking back at the trends of 2022 in manufacturing

2022 has been a year of growth for manufacturers of all sizes. While the larger economy may still loom uncertain for many industries, manufacturers are closing out 2022 with reasons to rejoice: both GBI and PMI reflect an expansion of production and new ordering in...